Featured Reviews

At Corporate Crypto Banks Ranking, we strive to find the best places to store, trade and mine cryptocurrency. Our featured lists can help you easily navigate the crypto world.

News

Corporate Crypto Banks Ranking is the perfect place to learn about cryptocurrencies and start to understand some of the fundamental concepts behind the blockchain.

U.S. Treasury says MEXC Global facilitated at least $16 billion in illicit transactions from May 2021 through May 2026. On Friday, its Financial Crimes Enforcement Network issued an order that will bar covered U.S. financial institutions from sending funds to or receiving funds from the exchange. Treasury’s Russian finding centers on MEXC transactions involving the sanctioned exchange Garantex and its successor, Grinex. FinCEN’s Section 9714 order covers MEXC’s subsidiaries, branches, offices and successors operating outside the United States. It takes effect 30 days after publication in the Federal Register. Garantex dealings give the Russian finding its force Treasury designated Garantex in April 2022. Its MEXC announcement says MEXC was still processing transactions involving Garantex and Grinex in June 2026, more than four years after the designation. That timing ties the order’s Russian finance finding to activity long after Garantex was sanctioned. As set out in this order, MEXC Global has facilitated funds transfers by Russia-affiliated illicit actors and in connection with other Russia-associated illicit activities, including sanctions evasion, and activity facilitated by Russian darknet markets. FinCEN, Section 9714 order FinCEN used section 9714(a) of the Combating Russian Money Laundering Act to find MEXC a primary money laundering concern in connection with Russian illicit finance. The resulting measure prohibits covered U.S. financial institutions from transmitting funds to or from MEXC. Treasury says the measure leaves existing Bank Secrecy Act duties and sanctions administered by the Office of Foreign Assets Control unchanged. The transaction figures show several routes through MEXC Treasury’s figures cover overlapping types of activity, so they should not be added together. The amounts describe separate parts of its case, from transfers involving sanctioned Russian entities to direct transactions with Iranian exchanges: At least $16 billion: Transactions connected to sanctions evasion, cybercrime and other illicit activity from May 2021 through May 2026. Nearly $1.5 billion: Transactions linked to Russian sanctions evasion, including $232 million directly involving U.S., EU or UK-sanctioned entities. Almost $200 million: Transactions connected to A7A5, a stablecoin Treasury says the sanctioned A7 network used to help clients evade sanctions. Approximately $1 billion: Direct transactions with more than 40 identified Iranian crypto exchanges. Treasury also identifies approximately $22 million in transactions for Iran’s sanctioned central bank, the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps and its Qods Force. It says MEXC facilitated at least $26 million in transactions benefiting the sanctioned A7 network. The ban hits U.S. intermediaries even though MEXC is offshore FinCEN’s order applies to covered U.S. financial institutions handling transfers involving MEXC, including its named current or former affiliates in Seychelles, Estonia, Switzerland and the United Kingdom. A covered institution cannot carry a transfer to or from MEXC through the U.S. system simply because the exchange operates offshore. Treasury says violations can bring civil or criminal penalties. Treasury says MEXC handled more than $1 billion in daily transactions and held approximately $5 billion in reserves as of September 2026. The order targets an exchange of that size by restricting access to U.S. payment rails. It does not shut down MEXC’s trading platform worldwide. The restriction also affects customers who try to move money through a covered U.S. institution. Once the order takes effect, that institution must reject the MEXC-linked route, regardless of whether the customer is using an offshore exchange account. Seychelles users face a separate recovery limit The Seychelles Financial Services Authority identified MX Global Ltd as MEXC’s operator. It said the company had never received the required virtual-asset licence or applied for one. The authority said it was pursuing enforcement measures and advised people with concerns to contact it or law enforcement in their jurisdiction. That licensing finding limits one route for users seeking help recovering funds. Seychelles’ regulator says it cannot investigate or facilitate recovery through its supervision of licensed firms because MX Global Ltd is unlicensed. The U.S. order imposes a separate limit on institutions moving money to or from the exchange. FinCEN’s submitted order says Federal Register publication is pending. Publication of the MEXC order starts the 30-day countdown to the transfer ban. The post Treasury Ties MEXC’s $16B Case To A Sanctioned Russian Exchange appeared first on CryptoCoin.News .

TL;DR: Aave Labs said November 6 it had acquired Avon’s team and technology, including fixed- and floating-rate lending systems and an onchain order book. The move adds expertise for fixed-rate borrowing, but does not mean a finished fixed-rate Aave product has launched for every user. Most people who take out a conventional loan want a clear answer to one question: what interest rate will they pay over the borrowing period? Decentralised finance often works differently, with interest rates that vary as supply and demand change within a lending pool. Aave Labs wants to broaden that model and has taken a new step towards it. In its November 6 acquisition announcement , the company said it had bought the team and technology behind Avon, a developer focused on fixed-rate and floating-rate lending markets. The transaction includes Avon’s onchain order book, protocols, domains and other related assets. Financial terms were not disclosed. What Avon brings to the project The Aave release says Avon engineers Prince Sinha and Ayush Kaul will join the engineering team, while Omar el-Ashaal will join business development. Their stated focus includes fixed-rate lending and new types of onchain credit products. A fixed rate can help borrowers plan expenses and hedge uncertainty. But supplying a dependable fixed-rate loan onchain requires more than setting a number at origination. Liquidity must be available over the loan’s term, interest-rate risk has to be allocated, collateral can change in value and lenders must be compensated for taking duration and credit-related risks. Avon’s order-book technology could be relevant because an order book offers a different way to match borrowing and lending preferences compared with a purely pool-based floating-rate market. The acquisition does not itself prove that a design has completed security audits, won any required governance approval or become accessible to ordinary customers. Why this matters for Aave’s existing markets Aave describes itself as the largest onchain lending network, reporting more than $33 billion of deposits and $13 billion of active loans in its announcement. Those figures are company-reported and can fluctuate with token prices, collateral flows and market conditions. The project already supports variable-rate borrowing and multiple asset markets. NewsBTC recently covered Aave’s protective freeze on new tBTC borrowing and supply , a reminder that risk settings and asset-specific decisions remain important even on an automated lending platform. Fixed-rate capability could be useful to fintech partners and institutions that want more predictable liability management. It could also introduce complexities around maturity dates, rates, early repayment and liquidation that need careful contract design. A project announcement is not a product launch Aave Labs builds products that interact with the broader Aave network, but governance and the status of each deployed market matter. The acquisition is a corporate development and an engineering investment, not a guarantee that a new borrowing market is live today or approved across jurisdictions. In NewsBTC’s prior reporting on Aave’s first externally curated V4 markets , the responsibility for risk settings and the structure of individual lending markets emerged as central questions. Fixed-rate lending will face similar scrutiny. What should users watch for next? Published product specifications, audited contracts, governance decisions, clear rate and repayment terms, and evidence of sustainable liquidity. Aave’s acquisition explains the direction of travel: bringing more familiar credit-market features onchain. Whether users get the predictability they expect will depend on how those features are actually designed and deployed. This article was written by the News Desk and edited by Samuel Rae.

Crypto wallet and interface revenues fell 60% year over year to roughly $400 million in the first half of 2026. This is according to a new report by 1kx, with the market insight provider noting that a rise in gambling and gaming income is what kept the decline in the wider consumer sector from being worse. Wallet Income Falls as Gaming Takes a Larger Share In the first half of 2025, wallet revenues hit about $1.1 billion, but the latest figures show it went down to approximately $400 million during the same period this year, with the roughly $700 million drop down mainly to lower trading activity and volatile crypto prices. DePIN, short for decentralized physical infrastructure networks, also saw revenues slashed, dipping 10% from $293 million to $264 million. The reduced income affected the wider consumer sector, which, in the first six months of 2026, ended up pulling in $5.0 billion, about $600 million, or 11% less than what it did in H1 last year. According to 1kx, that smaller overall fall was largely due to gambling and gaming, whose revenues went up 8% to $3.3 billion after raking in about $3.1 billion in the same period last year. That category now accounts for the largest portion of the sector’s reported income. “Overall resilience from gaming offsets wallet weakness, but highlights heavy reliance on volatile categories,” the account concluded. Wallet Activity and Network Adoption Tell Different Stories Elsewhere, other wallet-related metrics across major blockchains have shown mixed results. For instance, according to Santiment data, since mid-October, the Bitcoin network lost around 30,000 non-empty wallets, bringing the count to just under 60 million, something the analytics firm viewed as a possible sign of capitulation by smaller holders. That, it noted, created better conditions for BTC’s recovery than a sudden rush of buyers. Meanwhile, Ethereum presented a different picture, with data from the same source showing that its number of non-empty wallets reached well over 207 million in September, around the same time when the amount of staked ETH had risen above 40 million, with Santiment on that occasion suggesting the figures pointed to heightened network participation even after months of price action that was relatively weak. Wallets usually earn revenue from charging swap or transaction fees alongside integrated DeFi services, and it should be noted that more addresses do not automatically translate into higher fees. What the H1 figures suggest is that wallet revenue was affected by trading conditions, with crypto gaming income being less exposed to any slowdowns. The post Crypto Wallets Lose $700M in Revenue During H1 2026: Report appeared first on CryptoPotato .

According to a recent report from a local Chinese publication, Chinese regulators have moved against promotional activity by the Solana blockchain platform after large advertisements appeared on the exterior of the Citi Group Building in Lujiazui, Shanghai. The displays drew widespread attention in the cryptocurrency sector and prompted discussion across the market. Solana had planned offline events called Solana Accelerate China 2026 in Shanghai and other cities. Relevant departments halted those gatherings shortly before they were due to begin. China has maintained a consistent ban on virtual currency business activities for more than a decade. In 2013, the People’s Bank of China and five other departments stated that Bitcoin should not be treated as currency. A 2021 notice reinforced that Bitcoin , Ethereum , and stablecoins such as Tether lack official currency status. In February of this year, the central bank and eight other departments issued a further notice declaring virtual currency-related business illegal financial activity. The same document warned that domestic individuals or organizations that knowingly help overseas platforms provide such services to Chinese users could face legal responsibility. An official from the People’s Bank of China (PBOC) said authorities had detected Solana conducting high-profile marketing through domestic entities to promote its brand. The central bank, working with local financial regulators, public security and market supervision departments, suspended the planned offline events and will investigate the companies and individuals involved. Officials noted that Solana functions as a major virtual currency issuance platform. The Solana tokens it issues are cryptocurrencies, and the platform also supplies technical services that support the issuance and trading of other virtual assets, including USDT. These activities fall under the illegal financial activities defined in the latest notice; therefore, publicly promoting Solana violates the rules. Authorities added that virtual currencies at present cannot meet standard requirements for customer identification and anti-money laundering controls, making them prone to speculative activity. Going forward, the People’s Bank of China said it will continue working with other departments and local governments to curb virtual currency-related business in China. Enforcement will focus on traders inside China and on domestic entities linked to overseas issuance and trading platforms, with the stated aim of protecting economic and financial order.​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​

Wall Street staged a sharp recovery following the U.S. midterm elections, reversing earlier losses as investors reassessed the implications of Democrats taking control of both chambers of Congress. Notably, the turnaround has also drawn attention to Bitcoin and the wider cryptocurrency market as traders weigh the political outcome against its potential impact on crypto regulations. According to analyst Bull Theory, the recovery was particularly striking given the scale of the initial sell-off. NASDAQ futures had dropped more than 2% as election results pointed to a Democratic sweep , while Japan’s Nikkei and South Korea’s KOSPI also suffered significant losses. However, major indices subsequently rebounded from their session lows. The S&P 500 recovered 2.18%, while the NASDAQ gained 3.13%. The Dow Jones and Russell 2000 advanced 2.16% and 2.31%, respectively. In Asia, Japan’s Nikkei 225 climbed 5.09%, while South Korea’s KOSPI rose 4.71%. Bull Theory attributed the reversal partly to investors reassessing what a Democratic-controlled Congress means for President Donald Trump’s remaining two years in office. Although Democrats are projected to control both chambers from January 3, 2027, Republicans retain control until then. Furthermore, Trump’s presidential powers remain intact, including his ability to veto legislation passed by Congress. Overriding a veto would require a two-thirds majority in both chambers, a threshold Democrats cannot reach on their own. Notably, the election outcome could make it harder for Trump to advance his legislative agenda without necessarily allowing Democrats to push through major policy changes of their own. Investors may therefore be adjusting their expectations rather than treating the result as an immediate threat to financial markets. Bitcoin also fell during the election-related sell-off, briefly dropping into the $75,000 range as a Democratic victory in both chambers became increasingly likely. However, the cryptocurrency recovered as uncertainty about the political outcome eased. TDX Strategies founder Dick Lo explained that the recovery followed a reduction in election-related uncertainty. “ Bitcoin dropped initially in response to the Democratic sweep of the midterm elections, but has since recovered as a clear outcome resolves political uncertainty ,” he told CoinDesk. He added that a Democratic-controlled Congress is generally viewed as less favorable for pro-crypto legislation, while divided government makes major, market-unfriendly policy changes less likely. Meanwhile, analytics platform 10x Research warned that Bitcoin and Ethereum remain at an important technical turning point despite easing election-related risks. In a post on X, the firm wrote , “ While our systematic trend models remain technically short both Bitcoin and Ethereum, fading consensus to trade against established signals demands exceptional risk/reward skew. “ The firm explained that traders should look beyond political developments when assessing whether the recent correction is a temporary setback in a bull market or the start of a more significant shift in market direction. Its framework focuses on longer-term market indicators, trading-volume support levels, and key price thresholds to determine whether investors should remain defensive or consider taking bullish positions. Nevertheless, the post-election recovery does not eliminate other risks facing digital assets. TDX Strategies pointed to recent exchange security breaches as a potential source of pressure on investor sentiment, even as declining political uncertainty creates room for market recovery. That said, with Bitcoin and Ethereum still facing technical resistance, traders will be watching whether the broader market rebound translates into sustained buying interest across cryptocurrencies.